Top Tips for a Strong Mandatory Reconsideration (PIP or DLA)
- Mia Hughes
- Nov 18, 2025
- 3 min read

1. Do NOT just say “I disagree” — explain why the decision is wrong
A successful MR explains what the assessor got wrong, such as:
Incorrect assumptions
Ignored evidence
Misreported what you said
Focused on what you can do once, not reliably
Be specific:
“The assessor said I can walk 200m, but this is incorrect. On most days I can only walk around 20m before severe pain forces me to stop.”
2. Use the “Four Reliability Criteria”
For PIP especially, this is crucial.
Every activity must be possible:
✔ Safely✔ To an acceptable standard✔ Repeatedly✔ In a reasonable time
If you cannot do something reliably, you should score points. Use this wording:
“I cannot prepare food reliably. I cannot do it safely due to risk of cutting/burning. I cannot do it repeatedly without severe fatigue. It takes me over twice as long as a person without my condition.”
These four criteria win a lot of appeals.
3. Explain what happens on the majority of days
PIP and DLA both rely on “the majority of days”.
Explain:
Good days (if you have them)
Bad days
How often each happens
Example:
“I have 3–4 bad days per week when I cannot leave my bed due to pain and dizziness.”
4. Give real-life examples
Decision makers respond best to specific incidents, such as:
Falls
Burns
Mistakes with medication
Getting lost
Needing someone to prompt or supervise
Example:
“Last month I dropped a pan of boiling water due to hand weakness. My partner had to take over cooking.”
3–4 examples per descriptor is ideal.
5. Challenge inaccuracies in the assessment report
If the assessor misreported something, say so calmly and factually.
Example:
“The report says I walked 30 metres unaided. This is incorrect. I used my stick, leaned heavily on it and stopped twice.”
List the errors one by one.
6. Make sure your MR focuses on the descriptors, not the diagnosis
PIP and DLA are based on functional impact, not the condition name.
For each activity you are challenging:
State which descriptor you should meet
Explain why
Give examples
Refer to reliability criteria
I can help you identify the exact descriptor wording if you want.
7. Send new evidence, not just the same papers
Useful evidence includes:
GP letters
Consultant reports
Mental health notes
Physio / OT reports
Carer statements
Medication lists
Pain management or occupational therapy evidence
A diary of symptoms (even 7–14 days helps)
If you don’t have evidence yet, send the MR anyway and say:
“Further evidence will follow.”
8. Always include a symptoms diary (1–2 weeks is enough)
A diary is extremely powerful.
Include:
Pain levels
Fatigue
Falls
How long tasks take
Support needed
Whether tasks are completed reliably
Decision makers often change the award after seeing a diary.
9. Structure your MR clearly
Use this layout:
Section 1 – Decision you are challenging
“I am requesting a Mandatory Reconsideration of the decision dated … regarding my PIP/DLA claim.”
Section 2 – Summary of mistakes
List 3–6 main errors (e.g., “ignored evidence”, “incorrect assumptions”).
Section 3 – Descriptor-by-descriptor explanation
For each activity:
State the descriptor you believe applies
Explain why
Give examples
Apply the reliability criteria
Add evidence where relevant
Section 4 – Evidence list
Attach copies (don’t send originals).
Section 5 – Statement of truth
“I confirm that the information in this letter is true to the best of my knowledge.”
10. Keep tone factual, not emotional
Avoid writing:❌ “The assessor lied.”Use:✔ “The assessor’s report is inaccurate because…”✔ “This does not reflect my functional ability.”
⭐ EXTRA TIP: MRs rarely overturn the decision — but they set up a STRONG appeal
Only 15–25% of MRs succeed, but 70–75% of appeals do when the claimant sticks with it. A strong, well-structured MR makes the eventual appeal much easier. It will be the bed rock to form your appeal statement.
Please feel free to contact me if you want to know what help I can offer with your Mandatory Reconsideration by emailing maria@benefitiaforms.co.uk




Comments